Skip to content

The Inveterate Paradox of Dreaming

Francis Schiller

Archives of Neurology September 1, 1985 DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060080089021 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming
Citations 5
Key points Argues that interpretations of dreams and hypnagogic hallucinations have always been shaped by prevailing intellectual frameworks, from classical views of dreams as disease premonitions to Maury's "unconscious consciousness," Baillarger's "psychosensory hallucinations," and von Feuchtersleben's link between dreaming and coenesthesis.

Abstract

The paradoxical aspects of dreams have always been interpreted according to prevalent ways of thinking. Dreams as premonitions of disease have been reported since the classical era, and hypnagogic hallucinations, so named by Alfred Maury and viewed as "psychosensory hallucinations" by Baillarger in the 1840s (extending the Kantian definition of the madman as a "waking dreamer"), have been reported since the Renaissance. Maury also linked dreams to a paradoxical "unconscious consciousness"; von Feuchtersleben linked dreaming to Gemeingefühl or coenesthesis.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Explore topics