Skip to content

Effects of mindfulness on test anxiety: a meta-analysis

Eda Yılmazer, Zeynep Hamamci, Fulya Turk

Frontiers in Psychology June 24, 2024 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401467 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,275
Population Participants across 18 primary studies of diverse age groups
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
Topics Anxiety Meditation
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions reduced test anxiety with a moderate to large pooled effect size of −0.716 (95% CI: −1.383 to −0.049). The effect did not vary significantly by participant age, number of sessions, or delivery mode. The authors caution that potential publication bias and unexplained heterogeneity warrant cautious interpretation.

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on test anxiety across diverse age groups and intervention modalities.

Methods: Rigorous inclusion criteria were applied to select studies focusing on MBIs as the independent variable, with test anxiety as the outcome. A comprehensive search across multiple databases yielded 18 primary studies, contributing 20 comparisons. Data were extracted on study characteristics, sample sizes, and intervention details, and were analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results: The analyses incorporated 1,275 participants, with MBIs demonstrating a moderate to large negative effect on test anxiety (effect size = −0.716; 95% CI: −1.383 to −0.049). Moderation analysis indicated that mean age, number of sessions, and intervention delivery mode did not significantly influence effect sizes. Publication bias assessment suggested the presence of bias via Egger’s regression ( p = 0.025), though Begg and Mazumdar’s test and Duval and Tweedie’s trim and fill method indicated no missing studies.

Conclusion: MBIs are effective in reducing test anxiety, though results should be interpreted with caution due to potential publication bias and unexplained heterogeneity. The impact of MBIs did not vary significantly with participant age, number of sessions, or delivery mode.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on anxiety, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Research Review: The effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents – a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Children and adolescents 2018 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 3,666
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Does Mindfulness Meditation Improve Anxiety and Mood Symptoms? A Review of the Controlled Research Clinical populations with medical and emotional disorders 2007 Systematic review n = 15
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 24

and 19 more in the library

Explore topics