Skip to content

An empirical investigation of the associations between metacognition, mindfulness experiential avoidance, depression, and anxiety

Torstein Ådnøy, Stian Solem, Roger Hagen, Audun Havnen

BMC Psychology September 21, 2023 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01336-7 (opens in new tab)

The journal has published a correction to this paper. Read the correction (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 364
Population Community sample of adults
Measures Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-24 (FFMQ-24), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Topics Anxiety Depression Meditation
Key findings Metacognition, experiential avoidance, and the non-judging facet of mindfulness formed a latent factor of flexibility in cognition and emotional experience, while describing, acting with awareness, and observing formed a present-centered attention and awareness factor. Regression analyses indicated that flexibility explained more of the variance in anxiety and depression symptoms than present-centered attention and awareness. The authors suggest flexibility in cognitive and emotional regulation skills could be important in explaining symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Abstract

Abstract Background The aims of this study were to explore the possible relation between metacognition, mindfulness, and experiential avoidance, as well as their association with symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Methods: Cross-sectional data was collected from a community sample (N = 364) who completed the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-24 (FFMQ-24), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Results: There were moderate-strong associations between mindfulness (FFMQ-24), metacognition (MCQ-30), and experiential avoidance (AAQ-II) (0.62 − 0.67), and they showed similar relations with symptoms of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) (0.57 − 0.71). Metacognition, experiential avoidance, and the non-judging subscale of FFMQ-24 constituted a latent factor of flexibility in cognition and emotional experience, while three FFMQ-24 subscales (describing, acting with awareness, and observing) constituted a present-centered attention and awareness factor. Regression analyses indicated that flexibility explained more of the variance in symptoms of anxiety and depression than present-centered attention and awareness.

Conclusions: The results suggest that flexibility in cognitive and emotional regulation skills could be important in explaining symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on anxiety, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Psychological flexibility mediates the relations between acute psychedelic effects and subjective decreases in depression and anxiety. International sample of people who reported having used a psychedelic 2020 Cross-sectional survey n = 985
The Challenging Experience Questionnaire: Characterization of challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms Internet survey respondents reporting challenging experiences with psilocybin 2016 Questionnaire development and validation
Psychedelics and Mental Health: A Population Study Adult population in the United States 2013 Cross-sectional survey n = 130,152
Ecstasy/MDMA attributed problems reported by novice, moderate and heavy recreational users Ecstasy users who participated in a WWW study of recreational drug use 2002 Cross-sectional survey n = 282
5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) used in a naturalistic group setting is associated with unintended improvements in depression and anxiety. Adults who used 5-MeO-DMT in a group setting with structured procedures 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 362

Citations in the library

Explore topics