Skip to content

The Impact of Meditation on Instantaneous Respiration Rate and Amplitude: A Secondary Data Analysis

Ryan S Wexler, Daniel Klee, Joshua S Kaplan, Barry Oken

Mindfulness February 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-026-02757-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Secondary data analysis of an experimental study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 45
Population Meditators (n=30) and non-meditators (n=15)
Measures breath-to-breath interval (BBI), respiration amplitude
Topics Meditation
Key findings The group-by-condition interaction was not significant for breath-to-breath interval or respiration amplitude, indicating meditators and non-meditators did not differ significantly in how their breathing responded across conditions. Condition had a significant main effect on both measures, while group did not. The authors note the null interaction should be interpreted cautiously given the secondary analysis and limited power.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Prior research has established a correlation between heightened stress and a variety of health consequences. In addition, various measures of stress have been shown to be affected by mind–body practices. This secondary data analysis aimed to evaluate respiratory responses to acute cognitive stress in individuals of various meditation experience levels.

Method: Breath-to-breath interval (BBI) and respiration amplitude were recorded during four conditions using a piezoelectric chest belt. The effects of condition and group were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA. The group x condition interaction of the non-meditator ( n = 15) and meditator ( n = 30) groups was the primary effect of interest.

Results: The group x condition interaction was not significant for BBI ( F [1.26,42.70] = 0.34, p = 0.61) or amplitude ( F [2.09,71.02] = 0.60, p = 0.56). Regarding BBI, the main effect of condition ( F [1.26,42.70] = 21.94, p < 0.01) was significant, while the main effect of group ( F [1,34] = 0.05, p = 0.83) was not significant. Regarding breath amplitude, the main effect of condition ( F [2.09,71.02] = 34.39, p < 0.01) was significant, while the main effect of group was not significant ( F [1,34] = 2.81, p = 0.10).

Conclusions: Meditators exhibited greater breath amplitude than non-meditators. Changes in BBI and breath amplitude across conditions did not differ significantly by group; however, the absence of a significant group × condition interaction should be interpreted cautiously given the secondary nature of the analysis and limited power to detect interaction effects. Preregistration This study is not preregistered.

Comparable studies

Other experimental studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Cancer patients (clinical intervention study) 2003 Mixed methods: scale development, correlational, quasi-experimental, laboratory, experience-sampling, and clinical intervention study
Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. 2008 Controlled laboratory experiment
Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. 2012 Two studies: correlational study and experimental study
Mental Training Enhances Attentional Stability: Neural and Behavioral Evidence 2009 Experimental study
Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population. Incarcerated population 2006 Quasi-experimental with treatment-as-usual control condition

Citations in the library

Explore topics