Meditation-specific neural predictors of state mindfulness
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Within-subject state induction protocol with EEG |
|---|---|
| Population | Participants undergoing audio-guided mindfulness state inductions |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | Both focused attention and open monitoring increased state mindfulness and reduced theta power relative to an active control, while open monitoring additionally showed reduced alpha power relative to focused attention. Higher theta power was associated with greater state mindfulness in both practices, most strongly in open monitoring, and reduced alpha power was linked to higher state mindfulness only in open monitoring, which the authors argue indicates distinct mindfulness states with context-dependent neural signatures. |
Abstract
Objectives: Focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM) are distinct mindfulness practices that produce unique psychological effects. Prior research has frequently investigated the neural correlates of FA and OM states utilizing electroencephalographic (EEG) methods, focusing on changes in spectral power within theta and alpha bands. Yet the functional significance of these neural changes has remained unclear. Here we utilized a fully-within subject state induction protocol to more directly test whether EEG spectral power during FA and OM is differentially associated with subjective ratings of state mindfulness.
Methods: While continuous EEG was recorded, participants engaged in audio-guided FA and OM practices, as well as an active control condition (C), and then self-reported their state mindfulness afterwards. Linear mixed effects models were used to rigorously assess how condition-level variation in spectral power predicted state mindfulness scores across the three inductions.
Results: Validating the approach, participants reported higher state mindfulness and decreased theta power during both FA and OM relative to C; additionally, reduced alpha power was found in OM relative to FA. Most importantly, increased theta power was associated with higher state mindfulness in FA and even more strongly in OM, whereas reduced alpha power was linked to higher state mindfulness selectively in OM.
Conclusions: These findings add to the growing literature suggesting that FA and OM represent distinct mindfulness states. We further establish that the functional significance of theta and alpha power is context-dependent, clearly linking these neural measures to the subjective quality of specific meditation states and practices.