Skip to content

Neurobehavioural Group Differences in an Indian Holistic Education Context: Mindfulness, Empathy, Values and Personality Across Gender and Academic Pathways.

Mannu Brahmi, Abira Sharma, Harshita Jain, Jyoti Kumar

Annals of Neurosciences February 23, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/09727531261421196 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 580
Population Indian university students; behavioural cohort (Sample 1, n=580) and neurobehavioural subset (Sample 2, n=97, of whom 89 completed EEG)
Intervention Ānāpānasati meditation
Duration 50-minute Ānāpānasati meditation session
Measures IRI, PVQ-RR, IPIP-BFM-50, FFMQ-39, ARSQ, EEG spectral power (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma), PAF, COG, F3-F4 Arousal/Valence, Cognitive Workload
Topics Meditation
Keywords Personality Values Gender differences Empathy Neuroeducation Holistic education Academic pathways
Key findings Gender contributed significantly to variance in psychosocial traits: females scored higher in empathy, agreeableness, and self-transcendence-oriented values, while males showed greater emotional stability and power-dominance values. Academic stream and early subject choice had limited explanatory power, with small effects on certain value dimensions, and no differences appeared in EEG oscillatory dynamics related to state mindfulness across academic pathways. The authors suggest gender predicts trait-level variation except trait mindfulness, while state mindfulness shows universal neurocognitive accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Holistic education frameworks such as those conceptualising self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART) and the LIBRE/EMC2 model, prioritise the integration of social-emotional-cognitive-spiritual transdisciplinary factors-a focus perennially emphasised in Indian spiritual-philosophical wisdom.

Purpose: The study examines how gender and academic pathways relate to neurobehavioural differences in empathy, values, personality, and mindfulness in Indian university students-a context where these psychosocial, holistic educational factors might be particularly salient.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved a behavioural cohort (Sample 1, n = 580) evaluated on empathy (IRI), values (PVQ-RR), personality (IPIP-BFM-50), and mindfulness (FFMQ-39) traits. A neurobehavioural subset (Sample 2, n = 97) participated in a 50-minute Ānāpānasati meditation, during which their state mindfulness was evaluated through self-report (ARSQ). Eighty-nine participants in Sample 2 completed this intervention while undergoing concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) recording. EEG spectral power (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) was calculated across prefrontal, occipital, and default mode regions, and analysed in relation to state mindfulness, along with significant alpha power-related electrophysiological indices (PAF, COG, F3-F4 Arousal/Valence, Cognitive Workload).

Results: Findings indicated that gender contributed significantly to variance in psychosocial holistic educational traits: females demonstrated higher scores in empathy, agreeableness, and self-transcendence-oriented values, while males showed greater emotional stability and a preference for power-dominance values. The university stream (STEM/non-STEM) and early subject choice (science/math in Grade 12th) demonstrated limited explanatory power, exhibiting small effects for certain trait value dimensions. Notably, there were no differences in EEG oscillatory dynamics measured towards state mindfulness across different academic pathways.

Conclusion: This study suggested a distinct separation: gender significantly predicted trait-level psychosocial variation, except for trait mindfulness, while state mindfulness exhibited universal neurocognitive accessibility across academic pathways. In the Indian educational context, this supports embedding mindfulness practices throughout educational systems as a plausible, equitable strategy for holistic development and integrating social-emotional learning to promote gender-balanced development.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics