In vitro activation of the CB1 receptor by the semi‐synthetic cannabinoids hexahydrocannabinol (HHC), hexahydrocannabinol acetate (HHC‐O) and hexahydrocannabiphorol (HHC‐P)
Mattias Persson, Robert Kronstrand, Michael Evans‐brown, Henrik Gréen
Drug Testing and Analysis June 19, 2024 DOI: 10.1002/dta.3750 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | In vitro pharmacological study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Recombinant CHO-K1 cells expressing the human CB1 receptor |
| Intervention | Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) |
| Measures | EC50, efficacy |
| Key points | The (R)-epimers of HHC and HHC-P activated the human CB1 receptor as partial agonists, with five and two times lower potency than JWH-018, respectively; (S)-epimers had even lower potency. HHC-O epimers showed weak or no activation, suggesting the acetates likely function as pro-drugs in vivo. |
Abstract
Abstract Semi‐synthetic cannabinoids (SSCs) including hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) are emerging on the drug market and sold openly as purportedly legal replacements for cannabis and Δ9‐THC. By the beginning of 2024, 24 European countries had identified HHC, often sold openly in edibles (foods/candy), vapes and low‐THC cannabis flowers and resins. The SSC market is developing rapidly, with HHC acetate (HHC‐O), hexahydrocannabiphorol (HHC‐P) and others recently identified. These developments may mark the first major change in the market for ‘legal’ replacements to cannabis since ‘Spice’ containing synthetic cannabinoids, such as JWH‐018, emerged in 2008. Currently, there are some data available on the pharmacology of SSCs, which is crucial for understanding their effects, evaluating health risks and informing public health responses. This study focused on characterizing the in vitro activation of the human CB1 receptor by the (R)‐ and (S)‐epimers of HHC, HHC‐P and HHC‐O. Using recombinant CHO‐K1 cells expressing the human CB1 receptor, the potency (EC50) and efficacy were determined. It was established that (9R)‐HHC and (9R)‐HHC‐P activated the CB1 receptor as partial agonists and with five and two times lower potency compared to JWH‐018, respectively, while the (S)‐epimers exhibited even lower potency. The (R)‐epimer of HHC‐O activate the CB1 receptor to even lesser extent and the (S)‐epimer showed no activation. For HHC and HHC‐P, all epimers exhibited similar level of efficacy. This available evidence suggests cannabimimetic effects of the tested SSC with the exception for the acetates that likely function as pro‐drugs in vivo.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Cannabimimetic and discriminative stimulus effects of hexahydrocannabinols in mice. Journal of Psychopharmacology July 1, 2025
- Emerging cannabinoids differ in behavioral safety margins in mice: a comparative hazard proximity analysis of locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility. Forensic Toxicology September 14, 2026
- Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) use and harms in Ireland: New findings from the 2024 European Web Survey on Drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy November 1, 2025
Cites 3
- Neurocognition and subjective experience following acute doses of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH‐018: a phase 1, placebo‐controlled, pilot study British Journal of Pharmacology November 22, 2017
- Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) driven activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 results in biased intracellular signaling Scientific Reports April 22, 2024
- Hexahydrocannabinol and closely related semi-synthetic cannabinoids: A comprehensive review. Drug Testing and Analysis June 2, 2023