Skip to content

Ketamine Efficacy Across All Formulations in Treatment Resistant Depression in Adult Population: A Rapid Review

Bikramaditya Jaiswal, Neha Singh, Benson Benjamin

BJPsych Open June 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.173 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed
Population Adults with treatment-resistant depression
Interventions Ketamine Esketamine
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Key findings Across 10 placebo-controlled randomized trials, intravenous ketamine and intravenous esketamine were associated with higher response and remission rates than placebo in treatment-resistant depression, whereas intranasal esketamine showed no significant improvement over placebo. Adverse effects were mild to moderate and typically resolved within a day. The authors recommend IV ketamine and esketamine for early response and remission and call for further safety and dependence research.

Abstract

AimsThe primary aim of this rapid review was to evaluate the evidence base for the efficacy of ketamine across all formulations and routes of administrations in the treatment of adult patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD).MethodsThis rapid review retrieved controlled trials on use of ketamine across all of its formulations, including all isomers and across all routes of administration in TRD patients for achieving response and remission. This review included PubMed and PsycINFO databases. The retrieved studies were screened with the help of a screening tool and data were extracted by using data extraction forms by two authors. The studies were evaluated for quality of evidence, ethical issues and critically analyzed. Narrative synthesis was used for data synthesis.ResultsThis review retrieved 10 placebo controlled randomized controlled trials (RCT) on intravenous (IV) ketamine, IV esketamine, intranasal (IN) ketamine and IN esketamine in TRD patients. IV ketamine and esketamine showed higher rates of remission and response in comparison with placebo groups in TRD patients. There was no significant improvement in response and remission rates in TRD patients on IN esketamine in comparison with placebo. The adverse effects in the intervention groups were of mild to moderate severity and short lasting mostly resolving within a day.ConclusionThis review recommends IV ketamine and esketamine can help in achieving early response and remission in TRD patients and it seems to be a well-tolerated treatment option. Further studies are needed to assess these issues around safety, ease of administration and potential for dependence.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta‐analysis People with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder receiving ketamine infusion 2015 Meta-analysis n = 437

Explore topics

By condition and practice