Bringing the Hands to Mind
Hannah Lucas
Numen January 8, 2026 DOI: 10.1163/15685276-01234010 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that hand mnemonics in medieval Buddhism and Christianity share embodied attention as a phenomenological link while diverging in purpose: Latin Christian "meditation hands" aim at internal therapeutic transformation through contemplative self-examination, whereas the tenth-century Dunhuang Buddhist mnemonic P.3835 serves an apotropaic function through protective spells against external threats. The comparison also reveals the hybridity of "Buddho-Daoist" ritual practices at Dunhuang. |
Abstract
Abstract This article examines hand mnemonics as technologies of ritual practice in the medieval world, comparing an unstudied tenth-century Chinese Buddhist mnemonic from Dunhuang (Bibliothèque nationale de France MS Pelliot Chinois 3835) with Latin Christian “meditation hands” from thirteenth- to fifteenth-century Europe. Through phenomenological analysis of their attentional protocols – or how they “bring the hands to mind” – the article identifies cross-cultural patterns and divergences between the mnemonics. Where the Latin hands promise an internal, therapeutic transformation through contemplative self-examination, the P.3835 example serves a primarily apotropaic function via protective spells against external threats. Nevertheless, embodied attention provides a phenomenological link between these traditions, as well as between the P.3835 mnemonic and other texts in its manuscript miscellany, revealing the hybridity of “Buddho-Daoist” ritual practices at Dunhuang. By the article’s conclusion, the hand emerges as a complex nexus where ritual practitioner and world intersect, mediated through the simulacrum of the material text.