Skip to content

Environmentalism Without Foundations: Climate Change, Mystical Experience, and the Challenge of Environmental Justice

Russell C. Powell

Ethics & the Environment September 1, 2024 DOI: 10.2979/een.00008 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mystical experience
Key points Argues that nature writers Edward Abbey and Terry Tempest Williams share foundationalist epistemological assumptions with Christian mystics, and that Richard Rorty's pragmatism offers environmentalists a more effective basis for politics and hope in addressing climate change and environmental justice. Proposes that Robert Brandom's work better captures the creative possibilities of mystical experience that Rorty's framework cannot explain.

Abstract

Abstract: Edward Abbey and Terry Tempest Williams, exemplars of the American nature writing tradition and representative examples of modern American environmentalist politics, replicate the foundationalist epistemological assumptions of mystics in the Christian tradition. I examine the work of Richard Rorty for the encouragement his pragmatism gives to environmentalists to move away from traditional metaphysical concerns and toward a politics accountable solely to democratic reason-giving practices. Such practices, which Rorty connects to the Enlightenment’s aim to emancipate thought from any nonhuman form of epistemological authority, are more adept at meeting the challenge of environmental justice as well as more productive of the hope all environmentalists need in the work to stem climate change’s worst effects. I conclude by turning to Robert Brandom on the creative possibilities mystical experience opens to Abbey, Williams, and environ-mentalists like them, for which Rorty is unable to account.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mystical experience, most cited first.

Explore topics