Magical Emotions: Jean-Paul Sartre and The Headless Woman
Film-Philosophy June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.3366/film.2026.0357 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Sartre's early theory of emotion centers on a critical conception of magic, in which magical emotional consciousness disrupts deterministic logic and transforms the instrumental world. Contends that this magic parallels the displacement of spontaneity onto the ego in The Transcendence of the Ego and converges with Sartre's views on narration and expression, and that Lucrecia Martel's The Headless Woman both illustrates and pressures Sartre's account of emotional transformation as conscious but unreflective, purposive yet spontaneous. |
Abstract
This article reexamines Jean-Paul Sartre's early theory of emotion in light of his reflections on ego, consciousness, language and narrative, clarifying his often-overlooked but critical conception of magic. I first show how magical emotional consciousness transforms the instrumental world by disrupting deterministic logic and then trace a parallel reversal in The Transcendence of the Ego, where spontaneity is displaced onto the ego and its states. I argue that these forms of magic converge with Sartre's concern about narration and expression – how meaning is retroactively conferred on events and how representation both reveals and degrades lived experience – thereby sharpening Sartre's enigmatic suggestion that the social world itself has a magical structure. To assess and concretize these claims, I turn to Lucrecia Martel's The Headless Woman (2008), whose protagonist's headlessness uncannily illustrates, yet also puts pressure on, a Sartrean account of emotional transformation as conscious but unreflective, as purposive yet spontaneous. I show that Martel's attention to framing echoes Sartre's suspicion of language's hold on things, exposing the limits of expressive mastery and thereby revealing the stubborn autonomy of objects and others. The film thus illuminates how emotional magic implicates freedom, bad faith and social complicity.