Skip to content

Investigating sex differences in the acute effects of smoked cannabis: a potency-ranging, controlled administration, human laboratory experiment.

Madison Wright, Justin Matheson, Adam Zaweel, Christine M Wickens, Patricia Di Ciano, Beth Sproule, Bernard Le Foll, Bruna Brands

Psychopharmacology August 11, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-026-07144-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, counterbalanced human laboratory experiment Peer reviewed
Sample size 35
Population Adults who used cannabis 1-5 days per week (18 females, 17 males)
Intervention Smoked cannabis
Dose 0%/0 mg, 6.25%/47 mg, 12.5%/94 mg, 22.0%/165 mg THC
Topics Cannabis
Key findings Females spent significantly more time smoking than males across all potencies despite smoking similar amounts, and had significantly lower oral fluid THC concentrations while blood THC was similar. Aside from differences in the onset of some peak subjective effects, the authors found minimal evidence of sex differences in other outcomes and in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, indicating inconsistent sex differences in the acute effects of smoked cannabis.

Abstract

Rationale: Sex differences in the effects of cannabis have been demonstrated in animals, though the human evidence is more equivocal. In particular, more work is needed to better understand interactions between sex and dose in determining acute pharmacological effects of cannabis, especially at higher potencies of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Objectives: Sex differences were examined following a range of potencies of smoked cannabis (0%/0 mg, 6.25%/47 mg, 12.5%/94 mg, 22.0%/165 mg THC).

Methods: Thirty-five adults (18 females; 17 males) who used cannabis 1-5 days/week participated in a within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, and counterbalanced human laboratory experiment. Analyses compared peak change from baseline scores between females and males for smoking topography, blood and oral fluid THC and metabolites concentrations, vital signs, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, subjective effects, mood, and cognition.

Results: Females and males smoked similar amounts in each condition, yet females spent significantly more time smoking across all conditions. While both sexes achieved similar blood THC concentrations, females had significantly lower oral fluid THC concentrations. Aside from differences in the onset of some peak subjective effects, minimal evidence of sex differences was found in other outcomes, as well as in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate inconsistent sex differences in the acute effects of smoked cannabis across a range of potencies. While previous research has examined the influences of sex on the effects of THC, to our knowledge this was the first study to evaluate sex differences testing a large range of smoked cannabis potencies (up to 22%/165 mg THC) under placebo-controlled laboratory conditions.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 48
Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... 2009 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial n = 15
Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers Healthy male subjects 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 16
Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... 2009 Randomized controlled trial n = 15
Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Healthy volunteers with a history of light cannabis use 2019 Randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics