Skip to content

Phenomenological Differences among Self Hypnosis, Mindfulness Meditation, and Imaging

Daniel Brown, Michael Forte, Philip Rich, Gerald Epstein

Imagination, Cognition and Personality June 1, 1983 DOI: 10.2190/jwc1-axly-6r0l-g2nk (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Survey Peer reviewed
Sample size 122
Population Practitioners of self-hypnosis, waking dreaming, and mindfulness meditation
Interventions Self-hypnosis Waking dreaming Mindfulness meditation
Measures Profile of Trance, Imaging, and Meditation Experience (TIME)
Topics Meditation
Citations 20
Key findings Phenomenological dimensions in attention, thinking, memory, imagery, body sensations, emotions, time sense, reality sense, and sense of self distinguished the experiences of self-hypnosis, waking dreaming, and mindfulness meditation practitioners. Self-hypnosis involved self-referential thinking, memory changes, and intense emotions; waking dreaming emphasized emerging images with thematic unfolding and their own reality; mindfulness meditators reported difficulty managing distractions but greater bodily awareness and altered time and self perception with experience. The authors state the survey lacked the controls needed for causal analysis.

Abstract

A survey of 122 subjects was conducted to investigate the differences in the phenomenological quality of the experiences engendered by three types of awareness discipline: self-hypnosis (21 subjects), waking dreaming (49 subjects) and mindfulness meditation (25 subjects from a 2-week retreat, and another group of twenty-seven subjects from a 2-day weekend retreat). A questionnaire, the Profile of Trance, Imaging, and Meditation Experience (TIME) was used in the survey Discriminant analyses were used to construct models of the differences in the phenomenological quality of the experiences among the three groups. A number of phenomenological dimensions, in the major areas of attention, thinking, memory, imagery, body sensations, emotions, time sense, reality sense, and sense of self, were found which could accurately distinguish among the experiences of practitioners of the three types of awareness training. Results show that while self hypnosis involves self-referential thinking, memory changes, and intense emotions, waking dreaming emphasizes the immediate impact of emerging images, which unfold in a thematic manner and have a sense of their own reality. Mindfulness meditators have difficulty managing distractions, but with experience learn greater awareness of bodily processes, and experience changes in the perception of time and self; mental processes seem to slow down, and awareness assumes an impersonal quality. No attributions as to the causes or sources of these phenomenological differences are made, as the survey was not large enough to provide comparison groups, subject matching, or other statistical controls necessary for causal analyses.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics