Skip to content

“Song of Myself” as Inverted Mystical Experience

James E. Miller

PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America September 1, 1955 DOI: 10.2307/460106 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mystical experience
Key points Argues that "Song of Myself" has a coherent structure organized around a central "informing idea," rather than being a loosely organized or chaotic poem held together only by Whitman's personality. The author contends that critics' failure to find structure stems from not identifying this center of relevancy, and that Whitman's revisions reflect an effort to perfect the work rather than confusion about its nature.

Abstract

Whitman's “Song of Myself” has long been considered a loosely organized, perhaps even chaotic poem which is held together, if at all, by his own robust personality. He himself may have contributed to this concept of the poem. Untitled when it appeared in the first edition of Leaves of Grass in 1855, it was called “Poem of Walt Whitman, an American” in the 1856 edition; “Walt Whitman” in the 1860 edition, and was given the present title in the 1881 edition. This frequent change of title together with the many revisions made in the numbering of the sections and in the text itself suggests one of two possibilities: either Whitman was uncertain, perhaps confused as to the basic nature of what he was writing; or he was struggling to perfect a work of art the execution of which had fallen short of the conception. Too frequently the critics have assumed as self-evident the first of these possibilities. Inability to find a structure in “Song of Myself” has resulted, I believe, from a failure to find a center of relevancy, an “informing idea,” to which the parts of the poem may be related. It is the purpose of this paper to propose such a center, to show how it gives structure to the poem, and to examine the parts of the poem in detail to test their relevancy to this central “informing idea.”