Skip to content

Consciousness and the Cognitive Revolution: A True Worldview Paradigm Shift

Roger W. Sperry, Polly Henninger

Anthropology of Consciousness September 1, 1994 DOI: 10.1525/ac.1994.5.3.3 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the proliferation of new paradigms, theories of consciousness, and epistemologies traces logically and chronologically to the cognitive revolution rather than to chaos theory, ecology, or the new physics, and that these approaches depend on refuting the materialist paradigm to give consciousness a functionally indispensable role. Proposes supplementing bottom-up micro-determinism with top-down control by mental emergents over lower-level components, incorporating behaviorism and reductionism as methodology within a more comprehensive framework.

Abstract

Traditional scientific views of the conscious self and world we live in are challenged by an unprecedented outburst of emerging new paradigms, theories of consciousness, perceptions of reality, new sciences, new philosophies, epistemologies, and a host of other transformative approaches. This still expanding outburst can be traced, on both logical and chronologic grounds, not to chaos theory, ecology, the new physics, or dozens of other currently ascribed sources, but rather to the cognitive (consciousness) revolution that immediately preceded. These new approaches all share one key feature in common, namely, they all depend, directly or indirectly, upon a refutation and successful overthrow of the long dominant materialist paradigm. This is what was required to shift consciousness from an acausal or "eliminable" status to a functionally indispensable role. Traditional "bottom‐up" micro‐determinism had to be supplemented by a reciprocal, "top‐down" control exerted by mental emergents over lower‐level components. This does not dispose of behaviorism or reductionism, as methodology, but simply incorporates these within a more comprehensive explanatory framework. With the long reign of materialist constraints finally broken, other antireductive views have proliferated but with little regard for what the new paradigm allows.