Skip to content

How Christian Mysticism and Bion Can Help Expand the Christian Filter: A Response to Bland & Hoard (2026)

Gabrielle Taylor

Journal of Psychology and Theology June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/00916471261434169 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that Evangelical Christianity's 'Christian filter' may be enriched by incorporating Christian mysticism and Bion's concept of 'O,' which could support spiritual and psychological growth by tolerating mystery, unknowing, and lived experience, rather than foreclosing them through perfectionism and moralism.

Abstract

This article offers a clinical-theological response to Bland and Hoard’s Lacanian account of Christian perfectionism. I engage with Earl’s clinical work with patient Lucas for exploring the limits of the Christian filter embedded in his Evangelical Christianity. Drawing on Christian mysticism and Bion’s concept of “O,” I suggest that Evangelical Christianity may be enriched by a greater tolerance for mystery, unknowing, and lived experience. Lucas’s perfectionism is understood as a defensive stance, a moral narcissism, that forecloses desire, relationality, and psychological growth by resisting ambiguity and affective experience. Christian mysticism, articulated through Meister Eckhart, offers a non-dual framework in which human longing, fallibility, and desire become sites of growth rather than threats to one’s faith. Integrating Bion’s emphasis on emotional containment and learning through experience, I posit that a mystically informed Christian filter can support both spiritual growth and psychological transformation by holding complexity without collapsing into moralism or certainty.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics