Skip to content

Bizarreness in dream reports and waking fantasies of psychotic schizophrenic and manic patients: empirical evidences and theoretical consequences.

Ivan Limosani, Armando D'Agostino, Maria Laura Manzone, Silvio Scarone

Psychiatry Research March 24, 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.023 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case-control study Peer reviewed
Sample size 60
Population 40 actively psychotic inpatients (20 with schizophrenia, 20 with bipolar disorder) and 20 non-psychiatric control subjects
Measures Dream Bizarreness scale
Keywords Humans Analysis of variance Case-control studies Fantasy Dreams Wakefulness Bipolar disorder Schizophrenia Schizophrenic psychology Adult Middle aged Female Sleep wake disorders
Key findings Schizophrenic and manic patients showed the same level of cognitive bizarreness in both dream reports and TAT stories, while bizarreness was almost absent in control TAT stories; a significant diagnosis-by-condition interaction was found. The authors argue that cognitive bizarreness is a shared feature of dreaming and psychotic mentation beyond diagnostic categories, and suggest dreaming may be a useful model for the psychoses, though they consider the findings preliminary.

Abstract

Several overlapping features have frequently been described between psychosis and the subjective experience of dreaming from the neurobiological to the phenomenological level, but whether this similarity reflects the cognitive organization of schizophrenic thought or rather that of psychotic mentation independent of diagnostic categories is still unclear. In this study, 40 actively psychotic inpatients were equally divided in two age- and education-matched groups according to their diagnosis (Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder). Participants were asked to report their dreams upon awakening and the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) was administered to elicit waking fantasies; the same procedure was used in a control group of 20 non-psychiatric subjects. Two highly trained judges scored the collected material according to a Dream Bizarreness scale. The same level of cognitive bizarreness was found in TAT and dream reports of schizophrenic and manic subjects but was almost completely absent in the TAT stories of the control group. Two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures assessed the effect of diagnosis and experimental conditions (TAT stories and dream reports) on bizarreness yielding a significant interaction. Cognitive bizarreness seems to be a shared feature of dreaming and psychotic mentation, beyond diagnostic categorizations. Although these findings must be considered preliminary, this experimental measure of the cognitive architecture of thought processes seems to support the view that dreaming could be a useful model for the psychoses.

Citations in the library

Explore topics