Skip to content

Mysticism and mental health: A critical dialogue

George Drazenovich, Celia E.T. Kourie

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies August 12, 2010 DOI: 10.4102/hts.v66i2.845 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Citations 8
Key points Argues that across disciplines—including psychology, neuropsychiatry, social science, and theology—there is an emerging consensus on the relevance and potential efficacy of mystical experience in mental health, supported by accumulating data on its prevalence and efforts to clinically differentiate it from psychosis.

Abstract

Contemporary research suggests that a path is now open for critical dialogue between mysticism and mental health. Data are accumulating regarding the frequency with which mystical experience occurs in the general population. Social science researchers are undertaking studies to determine whether people can knowledgably differentiate between the presence of a mystical experience and other types of experience that occur in their lives. Psychologists are developing clinical criteria by which the mystical and psychotic experience can be differentiated. Neuropsychiatric researchers are exploring the effect of the mystical experience by way of enhanced brain imagery. Theologians are opening up the received wisdom of the mystical tradition and applying it to the present historical context. This paper drew these diverse disciplines together to demonstrate an emerging consensus with respect to the efficacy of mysticism in the field of mental health.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics