Advances InInterdisciplinary Researches to Construct a Theory of Consciousness
Pierre R. Blanquet
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science 2011 DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2011.14031 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 8 |
| Key findings | Argues that despite progress in neurophysiology of consciousness states, understanding conscious contents remains difficult, and while various philosophical and neural models exist, no machine has yet achieved artificial consciousness. |
Abstract
The interdisciplinary researches for a scientific explanation of consciousness constitute one of the most exciting challenges of contemporary science. However, although considerable progress has been made in the neurophysiology of states of consciousness such as sleep/waking cycles, investigation of subjective and objective nature of consciousness contents raises still serious difficulties. Based on a wide range of analysis and experimental studies, approaches to modeling consciousness actually focus on both philosophical, non-neural and neural approaches. Philosophical and non-neural approaches include the naturalistic dualism model of Chalmers, the multiple draft cognitive model of Dennett, the phenomenological theory of Varela and Maturana, and the physics-based hypothesis of Hameroff and Penrose. The neurobiological approaches include the neurodynamical model of Freeman, the visual system-based theories of Lamme, Zeki, Milner and Goodale, the phenomenal/access hypothesis of Block, the emotive somatosensory theory of Damasio, the synchronized cortical model of Llinas and of Crick and Koch, and the global neurophysiological brain model of Changeux and Edelman. There have been also many efforts in recent years to study the artificial intelligence systems such as neurorobots and some supercomputer programs, based on laws of computational machines and on laws of processing capabilities of biological systems. This approach has proven to be a fertile physical enterprise to check some hypothesis about the functioning of brain architecture. Until now, however, no machine has been capable of reproducing an artificial consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
Cites 13
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- The Neural Correlates of Consciousness Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences March 1, 2008
- From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela's exploration of the biophysics of being. Biological research 2003
- The neural correlates of consciousness: New experimental approaches needed? Consciousness and Cognition April 5, 2009
and 8 more in the library