Skip to content

Mythology, primary archetypes and idealism: Do myths provide a window into the transpersonal dimension?

David Furlong

Transpersonal Psychology Review July 31, 2026 DOI: 10.53841/bpstrans.2026.27.1.21 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that four symbolic systems—I Ching, Tarot, Kabbalah, and Heliopolitan pantheon—share a recurrent structure of eight archetypal principles around a ninth center, which may be interpreted as psychological structures or as indications of a transpersonal dimension, presented as heuristic rather than definitive.

Abstract

This article explores recurring archetypal patterns across four spiritual, mythological, and esoteric systems: the Chinese I Ching, the European Tarot, Jewish Kabbalah, and the Heliopolitan pantheon of Ancient Egypt. Through a comparative symbolic analysis, it considers whether these traditions encode a recurrent structure of eight primary archetypal principles organised around a ninth unifying centre. The article situates this inquiry within transpersonal psychology, Jungian and post-Jungian understandings of archetype, and contemporary debates concerning idealism and panpsychism. It argues that these cross-cultural correspondences may be interpreted either as shared symbolic structures of the psyche or, more speculatively, as indications of a coherent transpersonal dimension. The analysis is presented as heuristic rather than definitive, inviting further inquiry into the relationship between mythology, consciousness, and archetypal patterning.