Skip to content

Reconceptualising mindfulness in Cambodia: Khmer translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire

Alan Maddock, Thearith Heang, Nil Ean, Sisary Kheng, Karen McGuigan, Nerrolyn Ramstrand

Frontiers in Psychiatry August 19, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1901766 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional psychometric study Peer reviewed
Sample size 437
Population Cambodian adults with physical disabilities
Measures Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ)
Topics Meditation
Key findings The culturally adapted Khmer SMQ showed a 14-item, six-factor structure differing from the original single-factor model, with good model fit and internal consistency. The authors propose that mindfulness structure varies across cultures, influenced by Buddhist concepts like acceptance and reduced cognitive-emotional reactivity.

Abstract

Objectives: Mindfulness is increasingly used in global mental health, yet its measurement tools are largely developed within Western cultural frameworks. This study aimed to (1) translate and culturally adapt the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ) into Khmer, (2) evaluate its cultural integrity among Cambodian adults with physical disabilities, and (3) examine the psychometric properties and factor structure of the measure.

Methods: The SMQ was translated using a standardised forward–backward translation process with expert panel review and cognitive interviewing. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were conducted on responses from 437 Cambodian participants with physical disabilities.

Results: Following cultural adaptation, minor linguistic revisions were made to ensure conceptual equivalence. EFA and CFA supported a 14-item, six-factor structure comprising letting go, acceptance, non-judgement, cognitive-emotional reactivity, absence of aversion, and mindful observation. This structure demonstrated good model fit and internal consistency, diverging from the original Western single-factor model.

Conclusion: This study provides a culturally adapted Khmer version of the SMQ with evidence of structural validity and internal consistency and offers evidence that the structure of mindfulness may vary across cultural contexts. The findings highlight the influence of Buddhist psychological concepts, particularly acceptance and reduced cognitive-emotional reactivity, in shaping the experience of mindfulness in Cambodia. The availability of this scale enables culturally grounded research and clinical practice and supports the development of contextually appropriate mindfulness-based interventions in low- and middle-income settings.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Explore topics