Skip to content

From Reified Identity to Relational Ipseity: Hermeneutic Phenomenology, Language Pragmatics, and Contemplative Practices of Self-Deconstruction.

Roberto Aristegui Lagos, Javier García-campayo, Paulina Lamas-Morales

Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría August 15, 2026 DOI: 10.62641/aep.v54i4.2217 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that psychological suffering arises from the reification of the self as a fixed identity, and that self-deconstruction involves transforming the self's mode of being toward ipseity, not eliminating identity. Proposes a framework integrating Heideggerian ontology, language pragmatics, and nondual traditions to inform clinical practice.

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical and conceptual analysis of self-deconstruction in contemporary contemplative and clinical practices. It argues that psychological suffering is not primarily related to the existence of the self as such, but to its ontological and linguistic reification as a fixed identity, corresponding to idem-identity and to what Heidegger described as an ontology of presence (Vorhandenheit). Drawing on hermeneutic phenomenology, the self is reconceptualized as ipseity (selfhood): a relational, temporal, and performative mode of being-in-the-world. From this perspective, self-deconstruction does not imply the elimination of identity but a transformation in the mode of being of the self. This framework integrates three axes: (a) Heidegger's analytics of being-in-the-world and the distinction between sameness and ipseity; (b) a pragmatic distinction between indirect and direct reference in language, allowing experiential and clinical transformation without representational reductionism; and (c) a dialogue with nondual contemplative traditions and contemporary clinical approaches, particularly mindfulness-based and third-wave therapies. The article proposes a translational architecture linking ontological analysis, phenomenology of language, and clinical practice, and shows how non-duality can be understood in a non-nihilistic way when grounded in an ontology of ipseity. Clinical implications for psychotherapy, mindfulness-based interventions, and models of self-related suffering are discussed, including connections to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, cognitive defusion, and decentering, as well as boundary conditions and safeguards for contemplative practices.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics