Skip to content

NEURAL GRAMMARS OF TIME: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR THE ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORAL REALITY

Ugіs Kletnieks

Culture Crossroads August 19, 2026 DOI: 10.55877/cc.vol34.735 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that temporal cognition emerges from three interdependent processes—Temporal Representation, Temporal Construction, and Temporal Action—and that these mechanisms are phylogenetically conserved and early-emerging. Distortions in temporal processing in Parkinson's disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia reveal the fragility of the ~100-ms continuity window.

Abstract

Time is a fundamental dimension of experience, yet neuroscience suggests that the subjective flow of time is an active neural construction rather than a passive reflection of physical reality [Buonomano 2017]. Here, I propose the “Neural Grammars of Time” – a unifying framework explaining how distributed neural architectures transform physical signals into a structured temporal phenomenology. I would argue that temporal cognition emerges from three interdependent processes: Temporal Representation, which utilizes population codes, oscillatory coupling, and specialized “time cells” to encode duration and sequence [Eichenbaum 2014; MacDonald et al. 2011]; Temporal Construction, which leverages predictive processing and the multisensory “Temporal Binding Window” to assemble a coherent experiential present [Wallace & Stevenson 2014; Hohwy 2013]; and Temporal Action, which maps internal temporal scaffolds onto goal-directed behaviour and decision-making [Merchant et al. 2013; Paton & Buonomano 2018]. Evidence from evolutionary biology and developmental science indicates that these mechanisms are phylogenetically conserved and early-emerging [Merchant et al. 2013]. Furthermore, I demonstrate how distortions in temporal processing – characteristic of Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia – reveal the functional logic of these systems, particularly the fragility of the ~100-ms continuity window in disorders of conscious experience [Giersch & Mishara 2017]. By synthesizing computational, systems, and clinical perspectives, this framework provides a comprehensive account of how the brain constructs the structured temporal reality that underpins perception, memory, and conscious experience.