Skip to content

Reaching conceptual stability by re-articulating empirical and theoretical work on affordances

Roman Malo, Yannick Prié

Frontiers in Psychology June 14, 2024 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1283168 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Affordances ecological psychology Direct perception Empirical methodology Gibson 4e cognition
Key points Argues that affordance research suffers from a disconnect between abundant theoretical work and sparse empirical work, which undermines scientific validity. Proposes that re-articulating theory and empirical methods is essential, and offers a framework to guide empirical research on affordances.

Abstract

Theoretical developments on affordances have proliferated, resulting in a lack of conceptual stability and a potential compromise in scientific validity. However, affordances should not be discarded, given their centrality in post-cognitive theories and their widespread reuse across various research domains. Empirical research on affordances remains sparse, out of sync with theoretical advancements, and thus unable to contribute effectively to scientific progress due to its disarticulation with theoretical work. That is why re-articulating theoretical and empirical investigations on affordances is needed to pave a more fruitful path for the concept’s advancement. To accomplish this objective, emphasis must be placed on empirical research, leveraging recent theoretical propositions and devising corresponding empirical methodologies. The proposed requirements and framework represent a step in this endeavor.

Citations in the library