Skip to content

Efficacy of perioperative esketamine on postoperative depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hao-Yan Li, Wen-jing Xu, Ya-Mei Wang, Shuang Xie, Huanliang Wang

Frontiers in Psychiatry April 15, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1476449 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,724
Population Surgical patients from randomized controlled trials
Intervention Esketamine
Topics Depression Esketamine
Key findings Esketamine reduced the incidence of postoperative depression at 1 week (RD -0.09), 2 weeks (RD -0.08), and long-term follow-up (RD -0.06) compared with control, but was associated with increased adverse effects.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative depression (POD) represents a serious complication in surgical patients, exacerbating morbidity and mortality rates while imposing a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Despite its widespread clinical use, the role of esketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects, remains understudied in perioperative settings. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of esketamine on postoperative depression. To evaluate the effect of esketamine on the incidence and severity of postoperative depression in different types of surgery by randomized controlled trial, investigate whether esketamine can effectively reduce the postoperative depression score and the incidence of postoperative depression in the short and long term after use, to promote the application of perioperative analgesia-antidepressant combination.

Method: Searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Medline to identify randomized controlled trials using the drug of esketamine and analyzed the data using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: We included a total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1724 patients who met the criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that esketamine treatment, compared with control groups, significantly reduced POD. Improvements were observed at 1 week (RD -0.09, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.05], P < 0.0001, I²=84%), 2 weeks (RD -0.08, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.03], P < 0.00001, I²=97%), and long-term follow-up (RD -0.06, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.02], P=0.0002, I²=79%).

Conclusion: Esketamine demonstrates efficacy in reducing POD incidence and severity, although its use is associated with an increased risk of adverse effects. Also, the method of drug injection, the duration of administration and the number of doses may have an effect on the results. Therefore, further exploration of appropriate dosing regimens and multi-modal strategies is necessary to mitigate adverse effects. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024506329.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in randomized controlled trials of ketamine for suicidal ideation 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 197
Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with major depressive disorder who are treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 774
Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2025 Systematic review and meta-analysis
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RACEMIC KETAMINE AND ESKETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2022 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 2,903

Explore topics

By condition and practice