Efficacy of perioperative esketamine on postoperative depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hao-Yan Li, Wen-jing Xu, Ya-Mei Wang, Shuang Xie, Huanliang Wang
Frontiers in Psychiatry April 15, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1476449 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1,724 |
| Population | Surgical patients from randomized controlled trials |
| Intervention | Esketamine |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine |
| Key findings | Esketamine reduced the incidence of postoperative depression at 1 week (RD -0.09), 2 weeks (RD -0.08), and long-term follow-up (RD -0.06) compared with control, but was associated with increased adverse effects. |
Abstract
Background: Postoperative depression (POD) represents a serious complication in surgical patients, exacerbating morbidity and mortality rates while imposing a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Despite its widespread clinical use, the role of esketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects, remains understudied in perioperative settings. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of esketamine on postoperative depression. To evaluate the effect of esketamine on the incidence and severity of postoperative depression in different types of surgery by randomized controlled trial, investigate whether esketamine can effectively reduce the postoperative depression score and the incidence of postoperative depression in the short and long term after use, to promote the application of perioperative analgesia-antidepressant combination.
Method: Searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Medline to identify randomized controlled trials using the drug of esketamine and analyzed the data using Review Manager 5.3.
Results: We included a total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1724 patients who met the criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that esketamine treatment, compared with control groups, significantly reduced POD. Improvements were observed at 1 week (RD -0.09, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.05], P < 0.0001, I²=84%), 2 weeks (RD -0.08, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.03], P < 0.00001, I²=97%), and long-term follow-up (RD -0.06, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.02], P=0.0002, I²=79%).
Conclusion: Esketamine demonstrates efficacy in reducing POD incidence and severity, although its use is associated with an increased risk of adverse effects. Also, the method of drug injection, the duration of administration and the number of doses may have an effect on the results. Therefore, further exploration of appropriate dosing regimens and multi-modal strategies is necessary to mitigate adverse effects. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024506329.
Comparable studies
Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine for depression, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression | 2020 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | n = 1,877 |
| The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in randomized controlled trials of ketamine for suicidal ideation | 2020 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | n = 197 |
| Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with major depressive disorder who are treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal | 2020 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | n = 774 |
| Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder | 2025 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RACEMIC KETAMINE AND ESKETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression | 2022 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | n = 2,903 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- Psychedelics in neurosurgery: Potential utility in prevention, perioperative care, pain management, and neurorehabilitation Surgical Neurology International October 9, 2026
- Unmasking the psychiatric impact of ketamine in burn patients: Elevated risk of depression and acute stress reactions Journal of Surgery and Medicine June 11, 2026
Cites 16
- Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study American Journal of Psychiatry May 21, 2019
- Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression JAMA Psychiatry December 27, 2017
- Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1) The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology July 9, 2019
- Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry April 20, 2020
- Long-term safety of ketamine and esketamine in treatment of depression Expert Opinion on Drug Safety April 13, 2022
and 11 more in the library