Skip to content

Mindfulness and problematic smartphone use: indirect and conditional associations via self-regulated learning and digital detox.

Aamer Aldbyani, Zhang Chuanxia, Afnan Alhimaidi, Yanwen Li

BMC Psychology October 10, 2025 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-03485-3 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,241
Population Chinese college students from Shandong Xiehe University
Measures Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Problematic Smartphone Use Scale (PSU), Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS), Digital Detoxification Scale (DDS)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Cross-sectional studies Behavior, addictive Students Adolescent China Female Young adult Self-control Internet addiction disorder Self-regulated learning Digital detox Problematic smartphone use
Key findings Mindfulness was negatively associated with problematic smartphone use, and self-regulated learning partially mediated this association. Digital detox moderated the link between self-regulated learning and problematic smartphone use, with the negative association stronger at higher digital detox levels. The authors state the cross-sectional design means these are associations, not causal effects.

Abstract

Previous research indicates that mindfulness is associated with lower levels of addictive behaviors, including problematic smartphone use. However, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain insufficiently explored. Self-regulated learning has been identified as a process that may partially account for this association, while digital detox practices may be associated with stronger self-regulation. Yet, these factors have rarely been examined together within a single model of problematic smartphone use. This study aimed to investigate the mediating role of self-regulated learning and the moderating role of digital detox in the relationship between mindfulness and problematic smartphone use among 1,241 Chinese college students from Shandong Xiehe University. Participants completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), the Problematic Smartphone Use Scale (PSU), the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS), and the Digital Detoxification Scale (DDS). The results showed that mindfulness was negatively associated with problematic smartphone use, and self-regulated learning partially mediated this association. Further analysis indicated a significant interaction between digital detox and self-regulated learning in relation to problematic smartphone use. These results are consistent with a complex pattern in which mindfulness is linked to lower problematic smartphone use partly via self-regulated learning, with digital detox associated with a stronger negative association between self-regulated learning and problematic smartphone use. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. This study contributes to clarifying the mechanisms underlying the association between mindfulness and problematic smartphone use, highlighting the relevance of promoting self-regulated learning and digital detox strategies.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics