Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

TEACHING PHILOSOPHY AND ENACTIVISM

Andrei Simionescu-Panait

Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia October 30, 2021 DOI: 10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.14 (opens in new tab)

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This paper argues that enactivism offers a viable alternative to constructivist and classical views of learning, particularly in mathematics and philosophy education. Classical approaches treat students as mechanisms that solve fixed problems and store universally correct solutions, which reduces learning to informational efficiency. Enactivism, rooted in Varela and Maturana's work and updated by Davis, Proulx, and Simmt, proposes that students collaboratively produce problems, see multiple solutions, and become performers of knowledge. The article applies these ideas to philosophical education, addressing students' difficulty connecting new texts with their intuition, and offers a lesson design that explores students' thinking before introducing a text.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key finding Argues that enactivism provides a viable framework for education, emphasizing collaborative problem production and knowledge performance over fixed-solution discovery.

Abstract

The paper presents a concise history of enactivism in education, especially in mathematics education. Cases described by Davis’s, Proulx and Simmt’s work showcase the idea that enactivism is a viable alternative to constructivism or to classical views both in terms of practical teaching and theoretical models related to the process of learning. The idea that the student should solve a fixed problem, discover the universally correct solution, and eventually store that correct solution to find many other universally correct solutions to other fixed problems reduces the student to a very simple mechanism aimed at informational efficiency. This problem is met by the enactivistic tradition that began with Varela and Maturana’s work, now updated to the aforementioned researchers. Contra the classical perspective, enactivism proposes the idea that the student collaboratively produces the problem, being able to see multiple solutions, and eventually becoming a performer of knowledge. The article takes these ideas developed in mathematics education and finds their use in philosophical education. The article especially focuses on the student’s problem of being unable to link a new philosophical text discussed in class with their intuition. The last part of the article offers a lesson design example. The philosophical design focuses on making the students explore their own thinking regarding the topic about to be discussed by using a philosophy text before introducing the text.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment