Skip to content

Jean-Luc Marion’s Hermeneutics of Charity and its Relevance to Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Dialogue

Ben Carlo Atim

MST Review July 14, 2026 DOI: 10.67641/mstr.v28i1.2021 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Hermeneutics Dialogical self Openness to experience Pluralism philosophy Phenomenology philosophy Relevance law Epistemology Interpreter Religious pluralism Malleability
Key points Argues that Marion’s hermeneutics of charity provides robust methodological tools for interreligious dialogue by establishing an irreducible encounter with the 'text-as-other' that fosters openness and mutual respect.

Abstract

This study examines the methodological relevance of Jean-Luc Marion’s hermeneutics of charity to religious pluralism and interreligious dialogue. Grounded in his phenomenology of givenness, Marion’s framework challenges traditional interpretative paradigms by demonstrating that interpreters lack total epistemic control over a text. This limitation arises because the text maintains an independent phenomenal life and transforms readers into active, receptive witnesses. Consequently, this approach establishes an irreducible, infinite encounter with the 'text-as-other,' wherein the text asserts authority by giving and showing itself unconditionally. By applying this hermeneutical model to interreligious discourse, this paper demonstrates how the plurality of religious traditions uncovers a universal imperative for openness and mutual respect. The findings reveal that treating the 'other text' as an inherently valuable entity fosters a receptive disposition among dialogical partners. Ultimately, this framework provides robust methodological tools that strengthen current dialogical practices, offering critical epistemic resistance against the risks of cultural harmonization and assimilation.

Explore topics