Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

The Plausibility of Mind Uploading

Bojan Žalec

Poligrafi December 18, 2025 DOI: 10.35469/poligrafi.2025.519 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This article examines the plausibility of uploading the human mind onto a non-biological digital medium, a concept gaining traction with advances in digital technology and artificial intelligence. The author argues that mind uploading conflicts with theological perspectives viewing humans as an inseparable unity of mind and body. He critically examines the fundamental assumptions of mind uploading—dualism and functionalism—and presents arguments against its plausibility, including the biological limitations of consciousness, the phenomenological aspect of embodiment, the active perspective of consciousness, the significance of the body model in identity, and the role of the body in social integration. He concludes that mind uploading remains highly questionable, as the human mind is fundamentally dependent on its biological and bodily aspects.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Philosophy
Key finding Argues that the human mind is fundamentally dependent on its biological and bodily aspects and cannot be reproduced on non-biological digital substrates.

Abstract

This article discusses the plausibility of uploading the human mind onto a non-biological digital medium. The concept of mind uploading has gained significant momentum due to advances in digital technology and artificial intelligence. This question is highly relevant for theology and religion because it addresses key theological issues. Undoubtedly, mind uploading conflicts with religious and theological perspectives that view the human being as an inseparable unity of mind and body. Consequently, it should be examined from a theological standpoint. The author explores philosophical questions related to mind uploading, which are also very important for theology. He presents and critically examines the fundamental assumptions of mind uploading—namely dualism and functionalism—along with many arguments questioning its plausibility—including based on the biological limitations of consciousness, the phenomenological aspect of embodiment, the active perspective of consciousness, the significance of the body model in identity, and the role of body in social integration, relationships, and daily life. He devotes a lot of space to explaining the importance of the (lived) body. He shows how difficult it is to see how a non-biological digital substrate could replace it. He concludes that the plausibility of mind uploading remains highly questionable, both scientifically and philosophically. Based on current evidence, it is reasonable to argue that the human mind is fundamentally dependent on its biological and bodily aspects and cannot be reproduced on non-biological digital substrates.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment