Are observers reducible to structures?
arXiv Preprint Archive July 13, 2023 via arXiv
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPhysical laws express relations and symmetries that allow any relational structure to be represented in different parametrizations. If observers were reducible to their structure, observer-like structures from different parametrizations would map observables to physical properties differently, perceiving the same system in different states. The author shows that if such structures from all parametrizations were observers, their memory of the external world would correspond to facts no better than random guess. Since experience contradicts this, observers must be more than their structure, implying a unique correspondence between observables and physical properties. This result applies to both quantum and classical physics and has implications for structural realism, philosophy of mind, and quantum-first approaches.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Physics.hist-ph Quant-ph |
| Key finding | Argues that the correspondence between observables and physical properties is unique and becomes manifest through observers, because if observer-like structures from all parametrizations were observers, their memory would be no better than random guess, contradicting experience. |
Abstract
Physical systems are characterized by their structure and dynamics. But the physical laws only express relations, and their symmetries allow any possible relational structure to be also possible in a different parametrization or basis of the state space. If observers were reducible to their structure, observer-like structures from different parametrizations would identify differently the observables with physical properties. They would perceive the same system as being in a different state. This leads to the question: is there a unique correspondence between observables and physical properties, or this correspondence is relative to the parametrization in which the observer-like structure making the observation exists? I show that, if observer-like structures from all parametrizations were observers, their memory of the external world would have no correspondence with the facts, it would be no better than random guess. Since our experience shows that this is not the case, there must be more to the observers than their structure. This implies that the correspondence between observables and physical properties is unique, and it becomes manifest through the observers. This result is independent of the measurement problem, applying to both quantum and classical physics. It has implications for structural realism, philosophy of mind, the foundations of quantum and classical physics, and quantum-first approaches.