The embodied mind extended: using words as social tools.
Anna M Borghi, Claudia Scorolli, Daniele Caligiore, Gianluca Baldassarre, Luca Tummolini
Frontiers in Psychology January 1, 2013 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00214 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe paper proposes integrating the extended mind view and the embodied-grounded view of cognition by introducing the idea of "Words As social Tools" (WAT). It argues that words, due to their social and public nature, function as quasi-external devices that extend cognition, similar to how tools enlarge bodily space and modify the sense of body. The authors review literature on tool-use and words as tools, presenting evidence that word use extends space close to the body. They outline neural processes that may underpin this bodily space extension and discuss how combining both perspectives overcomes limitations of each view alone.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Body schema Embodied cognition Extended cognition Incorporation Language comprehension |
| Key finding | Proposes that words function as social tools that extend cognition and bodily space, integrating extended mind and embodied-grounded views. |
Abstract
The extended mind view and the embodied-grounded view of cognition and language are typically considered as rather independent perspectives. In this paper we propose a possible integration of the two views and support it proposing the idea of "Words As social Tools" (WAT). In this respect, we will propose that words, also due to their social and public character, can be conceived as quasi-external devices that extend our cognition. Moreover, words function like tools in that they enlarge the bodily space of action thus modifying our sense of body. To support our proposal, we review the relevant literature on tool-use and on words as tools and report recent evidence indicating that word use leads to an extension of space close to the body. In addition, we outline a model of the neural processes that may underpin bodily space extension via word use and may reflect possible effects on cognition of the use of words as external means. We also discuss how reconciling the two perspectives can help to overcome the limitations they encounter if considered independently.