Method for quantifying arousal and consciousness in healthy states and severe brain injury via EEG-based measures of corticothalamic physiology.
S Assadzadeh, Jitka Annen, Leandro R. D. Sanz, A Barra, E Bonin, Aurore Thibaut, Melanie Boly, Steven Laureys, Olivia Gosseries, P A Robinson
Journal of Neuroscience Methods October 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109958 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Healthy subjects in wake and sleep; patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and emerged from minimally conscious state |
| Keywords | Arousal state Classification Consciousness Electroencephalography Modeling |
| Key findings | Parameters X-Y and α/β from corticothalamic neural field theory fits to EEG spectra cluster subjects into three groups—conscious healthy, sleep, and brain injured—with X-Y tracking consciousness in healthy individuals but not distinguishing brain injury subtypes. |
Abstract
Characterization of normal arousal states has been achieved by fitting predictions of corticothalamic neural field theory (NFT) to electroencephalographic (EEG) spectra to yield relevant physiological parameters. A prior fitting method is extended to distinguish conscious and unconscious states in healthy and brain injured subjects by identifying additional parameters and clusters in parameter space. Fits of NFT predictions to EEG spectra are used to estimate neurophysiological parameters in healthy and brain injured subjects. Spectra are used from healthy subjects in wake and sleep and from patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, in a minimally conscious state (MCS), and emerged from MCS. Subjects cluster into three groups in parameter space: conscious healthy (wake and REM), sleep, and brain injured. These are distinguished by the difference X-Y between corticocortical (X) and corticothalamic (Y) feedbacks, and by mean neural response rates α and β to incoming spikes. X-Y tracks consciousness in healthy individuals, with smaller values in wake/REM than sleep, but cannot distinguish between brain injuries. Parameters α and β differentiate deep sleep from wake/REM and brain injury. Other methods typically rely on laborious clinical assessment, manual EEG scoring, or evaluation of measures like Φ from integrated information theory, for which no efficient method exists. In contrast, the present method can be automated on a personal computer. The method provides a means to quantify consciousness and arousal in healthy and brain injured subjects, but does not distinguish subtypes of brain injury.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Personalized stimulation therapies for disorders of consciousness: a computational approach to inducing healthy-like brain activity based on neural field theory. Journal of Neural Engineering June 10, 2025
- Neural field modeling and analysis of consciousness states in the brain. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2025
- Spatial spectral narrowing in the corticothalamic neural field model across consciousness states. Biological Cybernetics August 29, 2026
- Neural field theory as a framework for modeling and understanding consciousness states in the brain bioRxiv Preprint Server October 27, 2024
Cites 19
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto Biological Bulletin December 1, 2008
- A Theoretically Based Index of Consciousness Independent of Sensory Processing and Behavior Science Translational Medicine August 14, 2013
- Breakdown of within- and between-network Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity during Propofol-induced Loss of Consciousness Anesthesiology September 30, 2010
- Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity Annals of Neurology September 22, 2016
and 14 more in the library