Origins of molecular neurobiology: the role of the physicists.
Journal of the history of the neurosciences September 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1080/096470490512427 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractSeveral prominent physicists in the early twentieth century, inspired by revolutions in their own field, moved into biology and helped launch molecular biology in the 1950s. Two decades later, some of these migrants and their followers turned to the nervous system, consciousness, and the mind-body problem. This paper reviews that "double migration" and argues that while no new physical principles were discovered in biology or neuroscience, the physicists' analytical mindset proved invaluable. The concept of the gene was transformed from a mysterious entity to a real molecular object, and similar progress has been made on neural gates and channels. Understanding at the molecular level sharpens the mind-body problem by defining the material substrate of consciousness.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that physicists who migrated into biology helped transform the gene from a mysterious entity into a real molecular object, but no new physical principles were discovered in biology or neuroscience. |
Abstract
The revolution in the foundations of physics at the beginning of the twentieth century suggested to several of its most prominent workers that biology was ripe for something similar. In consequence, a number of physicists moved into biology. They were highly influential in initiating a molecular biology in the 1950s. Two decades later it seemed to several of these migrants, and those they had influenced, that the major problems in molecular biology had been solved, and that it was time to move on to what seemed to them the final problem: the nervous system, consciousness, and the age-old mind-body problem. This paper reviews this "double migration" and shows how the hopes of the first generation of physicist-biologists were both realized and dashed. No new physical principles were discovered at work in the foundations of biology or neuroscience. On the other hand, the mind-set of those trained in physics proved immensely valuable in analyzing fundamental issues in both biology and neuroscience. It has been argued that the outcome of the molecular biology of the 1950s was a change in the concept of the gene from that of "a mysterious entity into that of a real molecular object" (Watson, 1965, p.6); the gates and channels which play such crucial roles in the functioning of nervous systems have been transformed in a similar way. Studies on highly simplified systems have also opened the prospect of finding the neural correlatives of numerous behaviors and neuropathologies. This increasing understanding at the molecular level is invaluable not only in devising rational therapies but also, by defining the material substrate of consciousness, in bringing the mind-body problem into sharper focus.