XURSHID DO‘STMUHAMMAD VA JAMES JOYCE ASARLARIDA BADIIY PSIXOLOGIZM HAMDA ZAMON-MAKON IFODASI
Tamaddun nuri. May 30, 2026 DOI: 10.69691/psfdnr82 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThis article compares how Xurshid Do‘stmuhammad and James Joyce use artistic psychologism and chronotope in their works. It argues that inner monologue, stream of consciousness, psychological detail, memory, and subjective time shape literary text structure. The analysis highlights aesthetic outcomes from the interaction of individual consciousness, national mentality, and chronotope in both authors' writings.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Comparative literary analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Literary works by Xurshid Do‘stmuhammad and James Joyce |
| Keywords | Chronotope Representation politics Psychologism Trickster Proposition |
| Key finding | Argues that inner monologue, stream of consciousness, psychological detail, memory, and subjective time play a key role in the structure of literary texts by both authors. |
Abstract
This article comparatively examines the representation of artistic psychologism and chronotope in the works of Xurshid Do‘stmuhammad and James Joyce. The study reveals the role of inner monologue, stream of consciousness, psychological detail, memory, and subjective time in the structure of literary text. It also highlights the aesthetic outcomes of the interaction between individual consciousness, national mentality, and chronotope in the writings of both authors.