Evaluation of Biased and Balanced Salvinorin A Analogs in Preclinical Models of Pain
Kelly F. Paton, Andrew Biggerstaff, Sophia Kaska, Rachel S. Crowley, Anne C. la Flamme, Thomas E. Prisinzano, Bronwyn M. Kivell
Frontiers in Neuroscience July 21, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00765 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractTwo novel analogs of Salvinorin A, 16-Bromo SalA and 16-Ethynyl SalA, were tested for pain relief and side effects in mice. 16-Ethynyl SalA showed balanced signaling and produced strong, long-lasting antinociception in multiple pain models, including inflammatory pain, without causing anxiety. 16-Bromo SalA showed G-protein signaling bias, modest pain relief, and also lacked anxiogenic effects. Both analogs had longer duration of action than Salvinorin A and were more potent than the traditional KOPr agonist U50,488. These findings suggest that KOPr agonists can be designed to reduce aversive side effects while retaining analgesic properties.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Preclinical study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Mice |
| Interventions | 16-Bromo SalA 16-Ethynyl SalA Salvinorin A U50 488 |
| Topics | Anxiety Salvia divinorum |
| Keywords | Kappa opioid receptor Antinociception Biased agonism |
| Key finding | 16-Ethynyl SalA produced strong antinociception in multiple pain models without anxiogenic effects, while the biased agonist 16-Bromo SalA showed modest pain relief and also lacked anxiogenic effects. |
Abstract
In the search for safer, non-addictive analgesics, kappa opioid receptor (KOPr) agonists are a potential target, as unlike mu-opioid analgesics, they do not have abuse potential. Salvinorin A (SalA) is a potent and selective KOPr agonist, however, clinical utility is limited by the short duration of action and aversive side effects. Biasing KOPr signaling toward G-protein activation has been highlighted as a key cellular mechanism to reduce the side effects of KOPr agonists. The present study investigated KOPr signaling bias and the acute antinociceptive effects and side effects of two novel analogs of SalA, 16-Bromo SalA and 16-Ethynyl SalA. 16-Bromo SalA showed G-protein signaling bias, whereas 16-Ethynyl SalA displayed balanced signaling properties. In the dose-response tail-withdrawal assay, SalA, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA were more potent than the traditional KOPr agonist U50,488, and 16-Ethynyl SalA was more efficacious. 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA both had a longer duration of action in the warm water tail-withdrawal assay, and 16-Ethynyl had greater antinociceptive effect in the hot-plate assay, compared to SalA. In the intraplantar 2% formaldehyde test, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA significantly reduced both nociceptive and inflammatory pain-related behaviors. Moreover, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA had no anxiogenic effects in the marble burying task, and 16-Bromo SalA did not alter behavior in the elevated zero maze. Overall, 16-Ethynyl SalA significantly attenuated acute pain-related behaviors in multiple preclinical models, while the biased KOPr agonist, 16-Bromo SalA, displayed modest antinociceptive effects, and lacked anxiogenic effects.