The Onto-Rhythmic Self: An Ontological Reframing of Subjectivity
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science October 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-025-09937-0 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA novel concept of selfhood, the Onto-Rhythmic Self, is introduced, grounded in a participatory ontology where Consciousness and Time are expressive modalities of Being rather than substrates. By critiquing Husserl's transcendental ego and Dennett's narrative self across four axes—Who, How, What, Why—the authors argue that both synthesis and simulation fail to capture selfhood. Instead, the self is a modulatory field of Being, a dynamic site of rhythm, resonance, and relational articulation. This self is neither transcendental nor computational but an ontological inscription manifesting across neural, cultural, ecological, and quantum strata. Implications reframe individuation as ontic emergence, therapy as rhythmic re-attunement, and art as ontological modulation.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Subjectivity Narrative Situated Ontic Existentialism |
| Key finding | Proposes that the self is an Onto-Rhythmic Self, a modulatory field of Being disclosed across neural, cultural, ecological, and quantum strata, rather than a transcendental subject or computational fiction. |
Abstract
In the present work of intellect, we introduce a novel approach to selfhood, the Onto-Rhythmic Self, situated within a participatory ontology in which Consciousness and Time function not as substrates but as expressive modalities of Being. Through a comparative critique of Husserl's transcendental ego and Dennett's narrative self, we classify four axes of limitation: the Who of subjectivity, the How of temporal articulation, the What of ontological grounding, and the Why of existential necessity. To address such lacunae, we use a multi-layered method combining comparative ontological analysis, phenomenological reflection, and expressive mapping. Such a method discloses the limitations of synthesis (Husserl) and simulation (Dennett) and instead articulate the self as a modulatory field of Being-a dynamic site where rhythm, resonance, and relational articulation converge. The outcome features that the Onto-Rhythmic Self is neither a transcendental subject nor a computational fiction, but an ontological inscription that discloses across neural, cultural, ecological, and quantum strata. Its implications extend across domains: philosophically, it reframes individuation as ontic emergence; clinically, it reorients therapy toward rhythmic re-attunement; and artistically, it reconceives creation as ontological modulation rather than symbolic representation. By restoring depth, relational presence, and semantic coherence to the discourse on selfhood, through the Onto-Rhythmic Self, we add a structurally rigorous and experientially faithful grammar of consciousness, which is a new mode of listening to the rhythm of Being.