Sperry and the Age of Aquarius: science, values and the split brain.
M C Corballis
Neuropsychologia October 1, 1998 DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00062-1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Sperry's concept of emergent consciousness, though presented as materialistic, resembles Cartesian dualism and allows for free will and a synthesis of science with moral and religious values. |
Abstract
Although Sperry's empirical science reinforced a materialist view of the relation between mind and brain, his concept of an emergent consciousness that could causally influence neural function is reminiscent of Cartesian dualism, purportedly allowing for free will, individual responsibility for action and a synthesis of science with moral and religious values. Yet Sperry insisted that his view was entirely materialistic and that the critical distinction was not between a non-material mind and a material brain, but rather between holism and reductionism. A similar distinction is attributed to right- vs left-brain modes of thought as revealed by the split-brain studies, and Sperry's hope for the unification of holistic and reductionist approaches may also relate to his conviction that these two modes are fundamentally unified in the normal brain.