Moving beyond mindfulness: Defining equanimity as an outcome measure in meditation and contemplative research
Gaelle Desbordes, Tim Gard, Elizabeth A Hoge, Britta K. Hölzel, Catherine E. Kerr, Sara W. Lazar, Andrew Olendzki, David R. Vago
October 3, 2019 DOI: 10.31231/osf.io/48dgn (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractEquanimity, an even-minded mental state toward all experiences regardless of their pleasantness, is proposed as a key outcome measure for contemplative research. While mindfulness has been used as a measurable outcome of meditation, it encompasses multiple components, some better characterized as equanimity. The article defines and discusses the inter-relationship between mindfulness and equanimity from classical Buddhist and modern psychology perspectives, reviews meditation techniques for cultivating equanimity, and examines psychological, physiological, and neuroimaging methods for assessing it. Equanimity captures potentially the most important psychological element in improving well-being and should be a focus in future research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review |
|---|---|
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Contemplation Psychotherapist Mindfulness meditation Valence chemistry Social psychology |
| Citations | 6 |
| Key finding | Equanimity captures potentially the most important psychological element in the improvement of well-being and should be a focus in future research studies. |
Abstract
In light of a growing interest in contemplative practices such as meditation, the emerging field of contemplative science has been challenged to describe and objectively measure how these practices affect health and well-being. While “mindfulness” itself has been proposed as a measurable outcome of contemplative practices, this concept encompasses multiple components, some of which, as we review here, may be better characterized as equanimity. Equanimity can be defined as an even-minded mental state or dispositional tendency toward all experiences or objects, regardless of their origin or their affective valence (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral). In this article, we propose that equanimity be used as an outcome measure in contemplative research. We first define and discuss the inter-relationship between mindfulness and equanimity from the perspectives of both classical Buddhism and modern psychology and present existing meditation techniques for cultivating equanimity. We then review psychological, physiological, and neuroimaging methods that have been used to assess equanimity either directly or indirectly. In conclusion, we propose that equanimity captures potentially the most important psychological element in the improvement of well-being, and therefore should be a focus in future research studies.