Eduard von Hartmann, Pessimism, and the Europeanization of Buddhism

Eduard von Hartmann, a prominent public philosopher of his era, used Buddhism as a primary but imperfect exemplar for his vision of a 'religion of the future' centered on self-redemption (autosoterism). His philosophy reconciled pessimism and a panpneumatic (all-spiritual) impersonal unconscious with rationality and individual responsibility. Hartmann interpreted Buddhism through an ethical and symbolic lens based on the unconscious, which brought him into both proximity and conflict with esoteric spiritist discourses. He advocated a resigned yet heroic embrace of suffering life, rejecting what he saw as ascetic and quietist acquiescence. His hermeneutics reveal a modernizing vision of Buddhism as a model for the future, suitably reformed to accentuate a heroic response to suffering and karma.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Eduard von Hartmann was one of the most influential public philosophers of his era, known primarily through his Philosophy of the Unconscious. A conservative nationalist in politics, he positioned himself as a cultural and religious reformer and modernist ad­vocate of a “religion of the future” of self-redemption (autosoterism), one that reconciled pessimism and a panpneumatic impersonal unconscious with rationality and individu­al responsibility. This paper traces how Buddhism served as a primary albeit imperfect exemplar in his thought, how his ethical and symbolic interpretative strategy, based on the unconscious, drew him into proximity and conflict with esoteric spiritist discourses, and how this context informed his Daodejing interpretation. German Idealism disclosed the unity of reason, will, and nature, while Buddhist teachings demonstrated the world’s fundamentally contradictory and illusory character through nothingness (emptiness), nir­vāṇa, and objective illusionism and phenomenalism. Hartmann’s secularized moral and symbolic adaptation of Buddhism entailed a resigned yet heroic embrace of suffering life rather than what he deemed ascetic and quietist acquiescence. His hermeneutics reveal his modernizing vision of Buddhism as an exemplary model (if suitably reformed to ac­centuate a heroic response to suffering and karma) for the future.