Skip to content

Treating posttraumatic nightmares in trauma-affected refugees: An investigation of outcome predictors of imagery rehearsal therapy.

Ola Hornmoen, Jessica Carlsson, Jesper Dammeyer, Annette van Schagen, Hinuga Sandahl

Journal of Psychiatric Research 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.049 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pragmatic randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 62
Population Trauma-affected refugees who started imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) as an add-on to treatment as usual
Intervention Imagery rehearsal therapy
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Nightmare-focused therapy Nightmares Psychotherapy Refugees Sleep disturbances
Key findings Higher baseline symptom severity predicted greater improvement across outcomes, while low motivation and low cognitive functioning were associated with less treatment response.

Abstract

A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) did not find an effect of imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) for nightmares as an add-on to treatment as usual in a sample of trauma-affected refugees. However, certain factors may have accounted for substantial variations in treatment outcomes. This study aimed to test whether symptom severity, cognitive functioning, use of an interpreter, motivation for psychotherapy, chronicity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and variables relating to treatment participation predicted outcome for refugees receiving IRT as an add-on to treatment as usual. Data were derived from a pragmatic RCT, and those randomized to and who started IRT were included (N = 62). Outcome variables were pre-to post-treatment changes in sleep quality, nightmare severity, and PTSD symptoms. Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher baseline scores (more symptoms) were associated with treatment improvement across all outcome measures (βs = 0.32, 0.45, 0.44, ps = 0.007, 0.003, <0.001, respectively), while high motivation for psychotherapy predicted improvement in sleep quality (β = 0.28, p = .035) and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.28, p = .008). Additionally, lower cognitive functioning and use of an interpreter were associated with less treatment response on PTSD symptoms (β = -0.38, p = .002) and sleep quality (β = -0.28, p = .034), respectively. Findings indicate that low motivation and low cognitive functioning may represent modifiable barriers to refugees' ability to respond to IRT. The small sample may have affected the results, and future studies should use larger samples to improve reliability and generalizability.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Efficacy of a Cognitive‐Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia and Nightmares in Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans With PTSD Combat veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom and/or Operation Iraqi Freedom (mean age... 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 40
Lucid Dreaming Treatment for Nightmares: A Pilot Study Chronic nightmare sufferers 2006 Randomized controlled trial n = 23
Testing the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in lucid dreaming: A tDCS study Participants spending three consecutive nights in a sleep laboratory 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 19
Pre-sleep treatment with galantamine stimulates lucid dreaming: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study Adults with high dream recall and an interest in lucid dreaming 2018 Randomized crossover trial n = 121
Studies with lucid dreaming as add-on therapy to Gestalt therapy Adults with nightmares (ICD-10: F51.5) at least twice a week 2015 Randomized controlled trial n = 32

Citations in the library

Explore topics