Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Treating posttraumatic nightmares in trauma-affected refugees: An investigation of outcome predictors of imagery rehearsal therapy.

Ola Hornmoen, Jessica Carlsson, Jesper Dammeyer, Annette van Schagen, Hinuga Sandahl

Journal of Psychiatric Research January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.049 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Among trauma-affected refugees receiving imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) for nightmares as an add-on to usual treatment, those with more severe symptoms at baseline showed greater improvement in sleep quality, nightmare severity, and PTSD symptoms. High motivation for psychotherapy predicted better sleep quality and PTSD symptom improvement, while lower cognitive functioning was linked to less PTSD symptom improvement, and using an interpreter was associated with less improvement in sleep quality. These findings suggest that low motivation and low cognitive functioning may be modifiable barriers to benefiting from IRT, though the small sample size limits reliability.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Pragmatic randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 62
Population Trauma-affected refugees who started imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) as an add-on to treatment as usual
Intervention Imagery rehearsal therapy
Keywords Nightmare-focused therapy Nightmares Psychotherapy Refugees Sleep disturbances
Key finding Higher baseline symptom severity predicted greater improvement across outcomes, while low motivation and low cognitive functioning were associated with less treatment response.

Abstract

A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) did not find an effect of imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) for nightmares as an add-on to treatment as usual in a sample of trauma-affected refugees. However, certain factors may have accounted for substantial variations in treatment outcomes. This study aimed to test whether symptom severity, cognitive functioning, use of an interpreter, motivation for psychotherapy, chronicity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and variables relating to treatment participation predicted outcome for refugees receiving IRT as an add-on to treatment as usual. Data were derived from a pragmatic RCT, and those randomized to and who started IRT were included (N = 62). Outcome variables were pre-to post-treatment changes in sleep quality, nightmare severity, and PTSD symptoms. Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher baseline scores (more symptoms) were associated with treatment improvement across all outcome measures (βs = 0.32, 0.45, 0.44, ps = 0.007, 0.003, <0.001, respectively), while high motivation for psychotherapy predicted improvement in sleep quality (β = 0.28, p = .035) and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.28, p = .008). Additionally, lower cognitive functioning and use of an interpreter were associated with less treatment response on PTSD symptoms (β = -0.38, p = .002) and sleep quality (β = -0.28, p = .034), respectively. Findings indicate that low motivation and low cognitive functioning may represent modifiable barriers to refugees' ability to respond to IRT. The small sample may have affected the results, and future studies should use larger samples to improve reliability and generalizability.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment