Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Proposed Cut Scores for the Nightmare Experience Scale (NExS) Among Nonclinical Samples: An Analog Study

Emily O. Cooper, William E. Kelly

Individual Differences Research December 1, 2023 DOI: 10.65030/idr.21006 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A scale called the Nightmare Experience Scale (NExS) can accurately identify people who may have clinically salient nightmares, even in a nonclinical sample. In a study of 480 undergraduates, the NExS showed strong ability to distinguish those with possible clinically salient nightmares from controls, with an area under the curve of .941. A cut score of 9 or higher was found to be suitable for detecting potential cases. The findings suggest the NExS is a useful screening tool, but further research with clinical interviews is needed to confirm its value in clinical settings.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 480
Population Undergraduate participants
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Discriminative model Scale ratio Dream Rating scale
Key finding A cut score of ≥9 on the Nightmare Experience Scale is suitable for identifying potential clinically salient nightmares in nonclinical populations.

Abstract

This study employed an analog design to evaluate optimal cut scores for the Nightmare Experience Scale (NExS) to identify individuals with possible clinically salient nightmares (CSNs) in a nonclinical sample. Undergraduate participants (N = 480) completed the NExS, the Disturbing Dream and Nightmare Severity Index (DDNSI), and the SLEEP-50 Nightmare Scale (S50-N). Using established DDNSI and S50-N thresholds, participants were classified into possible CSN and control groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted to evaluate NExS accuracy. The NExS demonstrated strong discriminative ability (AUC = .941) in distinguishing between positive and negative cases of possible CSNs. Sensitivity and specificity indices indicated that a cut score of ≥9 is suitable for identifying potential CSNs in nonclinical populations. Future studies incorporating clinical interviews are warranted to determine the scale’s utility for detecting clinically meaningful nightmare presentations in clinical settings.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment