Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Subjective sleep‐related variables in those who have and have not experienced sleep paralysis

Dan Denis, Christopher C. French, Melanie N. Schneider, Alice M. Gregory

Journal of Sleep Research October 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12650 (opens in new tab)

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Poor sleep quality is linked to sleep paralysis, but the precise nature of the relationship is unclear. This study analyzed data from 860 individuals aged 22–32 years (66% female) from the G1219 twin/sibling study. Two components of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index—sleep latency and daytime dysfunction—predicted sleep paralysis. Additional factors associated with sleep paralysis included insomnia symptoms, sleep problems related to traumatic experiences, presleep arousal, unhelpful thoughts about sleep, and excessive daytime sleepiness. No relationship was found with sleep-disordered breathing, diurnal preference, or sleeping arrangements. The results suggest that improving specific aspects of sleep quality might help reduce sleep paralysis episodes.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 860
Population Individuals aged 22–32 years from the G1219 twin/sibling study, 66% female
Key finding Sleep latency and daytime dysfunction were predictors of sleep paralysis, along with insomnia symptoms, trauma-related sleep problems, presleep arousal, cognitions about sleep, and excessive daytime sleepiness.

Abstract

SummaryResearch suggests that poor sleep quality is related to the occurrence of sleep paralysis, although the precise relationship between these two variables is unknown. This association has generated interest due to the related possibility that improving sleep quality could help to combat episodes of sleep paralysis. To date, studies examining the association between sleep quality and sleep paralysis have typically measured sleep quality using general measures such as the global score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The aim of this study was to increase the precision of our understanding of the relationship between sleep paralysis and other aspects of sleep by investigating associations between different sleep‐related variables and sleep paralysis. Using data from the G1219 twin/sibling study, analyses were performed on 860 individuals aged 22–32 years (66% female). Results showed that two components of the PSQI, sleep latency and daytime dysfunction, were predictors of sleep paralysis. In addition, a number of other sleep‐related variables were related significantly to sleep paralysis. These were: insomnia symptoms, sleep problems commonly related to traumatic experiences, presleep arousal, cognitions about sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. There was no relationship with sleep‐disordered breathing, diurnal preference or sleeping arrangements. Potential mechanisms underlying these results and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment