Dream content analysis using Artificial Intelligence
Patrick Mcnamara, Kelly Duffy-Deno, Tom Marsh, Thomas Jr. Marsh
University Library Heidelberg June 26, 2018 DOI: 10.11588/ijodr.2019.1.48744 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 635 |
| Population | Users of Dreamboard.com who posted dreams |
| Duration | 4 years |
| Topics | Dreaming |
| Keywords | Dream Content measure theory Negative mood Content analysis Artificial intelligence Social science Psychotherapist |
| Citations | 11 |
| Key findings | An AI algorithm trained on over 35,000 dreams identified 47 dream themes and found small but significant male-female differences in 34 themes, with female dreams showing higher incidence for most. |
Abstract
We developed a dream content analysis system (DCAS) based on an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that was trained using a relatively large corpus of over 35,000 dreams. This sample of dreams were supplied by 424 female and 211 male users over 4 years who had posted them at the dream posting website and app Dreamboard.com. Building upon previous dream content ontologies developed by Hall, Van de Castle, Domhoff and Bulkeley, forty-seven reliably identified dream themes emerged from repeated application of algorithm and agent training procedures. DCAS reproduced most of the key dream content themes from these previous ontologies but also returned some unexpected findings. Mixed-model estimation detected significant male-female content differences for 34 dream themes, with female dreams evidencing higher incidence percentages for most themes, but effect sizes were small. Mixed-model logistic regression identified those themes that best predicted self-reported positive or negative mood associated with dreams. We conclude that the AI-based DCAS algorithm developed here is a promising tool for detailed analyses of dream content patterns.
Comparable studies
Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... | 2009 | Observational study | n = 6 |
| Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance Young adults with a mean age of 20 years | 2002 | Prospective observational study | n = 116 |
| Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... | 1987 | Case-control study | n = 11 |
| The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams | 2004 | Observational cohort | n = 147 |
| Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects | 2018 | Observational cohort | n = 14 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Dreams are more “predictable” than you think Frontiers in Sleep July 23, 2025
- New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences December 1, 2024
- Studying dream experience through dream reports: Points of contact between dream research and first-person methods in consciousness science