THE EXPERIENCE OF “MYSTERIUM TREMENDUM” IN S.L. FRANK’S AND R. OTTO’S PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION

The article compares how Semyon Frank and Rudolf Otto describe the structure and content of religious experience, especially the experience of "mysterium tremendum." It shows connections between their concepts of mystery and the "utterly different." The author identifies references to Otto's idea of the "sacred" in Frank's works, including recently introduced texts like "First Philosophy" and lecture notes on the "Philosophy of Religion." Frank describes the Holy as a mystery evoking awe, similar to Otto's numinous and mysterium tremendum. However, Frank gives Otto's phenomenological categories an ontological character, integrating them into his principle of antinomic monodualism.

Study at a glance

Abstract

The article deals with a comparative analysis of the structure and content of religious experience, specifically the experience of “mysterium tremendum”, in the works of Semyon Frank and Rudolf Otto. It reveals the connection between the concepts of “mysterium tremendum”, “mystery”, and the “the utterly different” as used by the authors. The author attempts to identify perspectives in S.L. Frank’s works that reference the idea of the “sacred” in R. Otto’s work, and to articulate their significance for S.L. Frank’s ontology. The article considers recently introduced works by S.L. Frank, including the text “First Philosophy” and lecture notes on the “Philosophy of Religion”. It is argued that S.L. Frank describes the nature of the “Holy” and the structure of religious experience by drawing on the framework of religious experience from R. Otto’s work “The Sacred”. Like the “numinous”, the Holy is described by S.L. Frank as a mystery that evokes awe and is compared to R. Otto’s phenomenological category of “mysterium tremendum”. At the same time, the work “The Unknowable”, as the author calls it, is “an ontological introduction to the philosophy of religion”. The categories of R. Otto’s phenomenology of religion are given an ontological character, and they are integrated into the structural principle of reality developed by S.L. Frank – the principle of antinomic monodualism.