Skip to content

The Enigma of the Oceanic Feeling

William B. Parsons

June 17, 1999 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195115086.001.0001 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis
Key points Argues that psychoanalysis contains not only a pathologizing view of mysticism but also ego-adaptive and transformational models, and that Freud misinterpreted Rolland's oceanic feeling.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the history of the psychoanalytic theory of mysticism, starting with the seminal correspondence between Freud and Romain Rolland concerning the concept of “oceanic feeling.” Providing a corrective to current views which frame psychoanalysis as pathologizing mysticism, Parsons reveals the existence of three models entertained by Freud and Rolland: the classical reductive, ego-adaptive, and transformational (which allows for a transcendent dimension to mysticism). Then, reconstructing Rolland’s personal mysticism (the “oceanic feeling”) through texts and letters unavailable to Freud, Parsons argues that Freud misinterpreted the oceanic feeling. In offering a fresh interpretation of Rolland’s mysticism, Parsons constructs a new dialogical approach for psychoanalytic theory of mysticism which integrates culture studies, developmental perspectives, and the deep epistemological and transcendent claims of the mystics.