Atheistic Theism: Brook Ziporyn’s Mystical Atheism and the Exclusivity of Beatitude
Benjamin Birkenstock, Gregory S. Moss
Topoi June 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s11245-026-10436-z (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe authors introduce the concept of 'atheistic theism' to reconcile monotheism with Brook Ziporyn's concept of mystical atheism. They argue that Ziporyn's principle of intersubsumption—the idea that any determinate content is indistinct from any and all other contents—leads to this reconciliation. In atheistic theism, both atheism and monotheism become contradictory: absolute intersubsumption requires a theistic transformation of atheism and an atheistic transformation of monotheism.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism |
| Keywords | Monotheism Atheism Mistake Absolute philosophy |
| Key finding | Argues that Ziporyn's principle of intersubsumption engenders a concept of 'atheistic theism' that reconciles monotheism with mystical atheism, transforming both into contradictory forms. |
Abstract
Abstract By introducing the concept of atheistic theism, we mean to reconcile monotheism with Brook Ziporn’s concept of mystical atheism. We demonstrate that Ziporyn’s own principle of intersubsumption, the principle according to which any determinate content is indistinct from any and all other contents, engenders this very result. In atheistic theism, both atheism and monotheism take on a contradictory character: absolute intersubsumption calls for a theistic transformation of atheism as well as an atheistic transformation of monotheism.