Shared understanding is correlated with shared neural responses in the default mode network
Mai Nguyen, Tamara Vanderwal, Uri Hasson
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | fMRI study |
|---|---|
| Topics | Default mode network |
| Key points | The more similar two people's interpretations of an abstract shape movie were, the more similar their neural responses were in the default mode network, and these shared responses were modality invariant. |
Abstract
Abstract Humans have a striking ability to infer meaning from even the sparsest and most abstract forms of narratives. At the same time, flexibility in the form of a narrative is matched by inherent ambiguity in the interpretation of it. How does the brain represent subtle, idiosyncratic differences in the interpretation of abstract and ambiguous narratives? In this fMRI study, we scanned subjects watching a 7-min original animation that depicts a complex narrative through the movement of simple geometric shapes. We additionally scanned two separate groups listening to concrete verbal descriptions of either the social narrative or the physical properties of the movie. After scanning, all subjects freely recalled their interpretation of the stimulus. Using an intersubject representational similarity analysis, we compared the similarity of narrative interpretation across subjects, as measured using text analysis, with the similarity of neural responses, as measured using intersubject correlation (ISC). We found that the more similar two people’s interpretations of the abstract shape movie were, the more similar their neural responses were in the default mode network (DMN). Moreover, these shared responses were modality invariant: despite vast differences in stimulus properties, we found that the shapes movie and the verbal interpretation of the movie elicited shared responses in linguistic areas and a subset of the DMN when subjects shared interpretations. Together, these results suggest that the DMN is not only sensitive to subtle individual differences in narrative interpretation, but also resilient to large differences in the modality of the narrative. Significance statement The same narrative can be both communicated in different ways and interpreted in different ways. How are subtle, idiosyncratic differences in the interpretation of complex narratives presented in different forms represented in the brain? In this fMRI study, we show that the more similarly two people interpreted an ambiguous animation composed of moving shapes, the more similar their neural responses were in the Default Mode Network. In addition, by presenting the same narrative in a different form, we found shared responses across modalities when subjects shared interpretations despite the vast differences in modality of the stimuli. Together, these results suggest that the DMN is at once sensitive to individual differences in narrative interpretation and resilient to differences narrative modality.
Comparable studies
Other experimental studies on default mode network, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality Healthy subjects | 2008 | Observational study using resting-state fMRI and seed correlation analysis | |
| Patterns of Brain Activity Supporting Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, and Theory of Mind, and Their Relationship to the Default Mode Network Healthy subjects | 2009 | Experimental study using fMRI | |
| Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension Human subjects | 2016 | Experimental study | |
| Broadband Cortical Desynchronization Underlies the Human Psychedelic State Healthy human participants | 2013 | Experimental study | |
| The brain on art: intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network Human observers | 2012 | Observational study with fMRI and behavioral analysis |