Weak Task Synchronization of Default Mode Network in Task Based Paradigms
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe default mode network (DMN), brain areas that typically deactivate during externally focused tasks, shows more complex behavior than previously thought. Analyzing four public fMRI datasets from 223 subjects across seven cognitive tasks, a new method called Inter Trial Temporal Synchronization Analysis (IT-TSA) and Inter Subject TSA (IS-TSA) revealed large variability in DMN activity across subjects, trials, and brain regions. All task-negative regions and even weak task-positive regions exhibited low synchronization across trials and subjects. This variability likely stems from neural differences rather than structural or hemodynamic variations. The findings challenge the view of the DMN as simply task-negative, suggesting it actively supports self-referential and autobiographical processes that deactivate differentially and nonlinearly during external tasks.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 223 |
| Population | Human subjects from four publicly available fMRI datasets |
| Key finding | The default mode network exhibits large variability across subjects, trials, and regions, with low synchronization, challenging its characterization as a uniformly task-negative network. |
Abstract
Abstract Default mode network (DMN) are the areas of the brain that get deactivated upon the presentation of externally focused, attention demanding tasks. Interestingly, these areas are consistently deactivated irrespective of the nature of the task. Recent evidence shows that the behavior of the DMN may be more nuanced than what was earlier believed. We wanted to investigate the dynamics of DMN further and utilized novel statistical approaches to study the same. We analysed four publicly available datasets (total 223 subjects) across seven tasks related to different cognitive modalities and found out that there is a large amount of variability in the presumed task-negative network across subjects, trials and regions. We designed a method called Inter Trial Temporal Synchronization Analysis (IT-TSA) and Inter Subject TSA (IS-TSA) to analyse variability across trials and subjects respectively. We found out that all task-negative regions and even weak task-positive regions have low synchronization across trials and subjects. We hypothesize that the DMN variability might be more due to neural differences rather than structural or HRF variations. We also investigated the use of non GLM technique like the Inter Subject Correlation (ISC) and found that it may only be suitable to study tightly synchronized task-positive regions. Our study challenges the understanding of DMN as a task-negative region and advances the findings that DMN acts as an active component associated with a unique set of self-referential, autobiographical processes which are deactivated differentially and non linearly across trials and subjects in the presence of extrinsic processes. Highlights Default Mode Network is weakly synchronized across trials and subjects in task paradigms. Inter Subject Correlation is not suited to detect task-based activations in DMN. Synchronization Analysis reveals temporal structure in fMRI data.